Gian Singh v. State of Punjab Abstract This paper will deal with compoundable and non-compoundable offences, and when the high court can quash any criminal proceedings. In what situations can the High court quash any proceeding is discussed. See more This paper will deal with compoundable and non-compoundable offences, and when the high court can quash any criminal proceedings. In what situations can the High court quash any proceeding is discussed. Since … See more The petitioner has been convicted under Section 420 and Section 120B, of the Indian Penal Code by the learned Magistrate. He filed an appeal challenging his conviction before … See more To compound means “to settle a matter by a money payment, instead of other liability.”In criminal law, the power to compound the offence is at the discretion of the victim. Legal provisions regarding compounding of … See more The petitioner is has been accused of : 1. Section 420, Indian Penal Code Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property —Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any … See more WebCase-Analysis-K.M-Nanavati-v.-State-of-Maharashtra-By-Tanya-Tikiya. ... Crpc Summary Notes. Amitav Talukdar. MP_Sharma_and_Ors_vs_Satish_Chandra_and_Ors_150319s540018COM518529. ... Gian Singh v. State of Punjab - Indian Law Portal. Gian Singh v. State of Punjab - Indian …
Gian Singh V. The State Of Punjab – India Asian Encyclopedia …
Web– In the instant matter, the Petitioner, Gian Kaur and her husband Harbans Singh were charged and committed the offence of abetment to suicide of their daughter-in-law, … edward lee md houston texas
Gian Singh Petitioner v. State Of Punjab & Another S
WebAug 7, 2007 · Gian Singh V. The State Of Punjab [1961] Insc 351; Air 1962 Sc 219; 1962 (3) Scr 515 (11 December 1961) Court Judgment Information Year: 1961 Date: 11 December 1961 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [1961] INSC 351 Text of the Court Opinion 11/12/1961 SHAH, J.C. SHAH, J.C. GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. SUBBARAO, K. … WebApr 11, 2024 · Read Order: HARPAL SINGH & ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA Mansimran Kaur . Chandigarh, April 11, 2024: The Punjab and Haryana High Court has reiterated the Supreme Court’s decision in Ramgopal & Anr v.The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others that in non-compoundable cases of pre-dominantly private nature, even if a compromise … WebToggle Case Summary subsection 1.1 The Petitioners. 1.2 ... The Supreme Court held that Article 15 places positive and negative obligations on the State in Navtej Singh Johar v ... literal interpretation when the words of a statute are clear and unambiguous in the ruling of the Raghunath Rai Bareja v. Punjab National Bank (2007). While ... consumer infrared module header